Why an Energy Management System is the best option

Posted on: May 1, 2024

Let’s delve into the fascinating world of energy management systems (EMS) and traditional building management systems (BMS). We’ll explore their differences and highlight why EMS’s are the superior choice for energy monitoring, analysis, and data insights.

Energy Management Systems (EMS) vs. Traditional Building Management Systems (BMS)

Purpose and Scope

EMS: Energy management systems are specifically designed to monitor energy consumption within a facility. It focuses solely on energy-related data, including electricity, gas, water, and other utilities. EMSs provide real-time visibility into energy usage patterns, allowing facilities managers to optimise consumption and reduce costs.

BMS: Building management systems, on the other hand, encompasses a broader range of functions. It handles not only energy but also other aspects of building operations, such as HVAC control, security, lighting, and occupancy management. BMSs serve as a centralised platform for overall facility management, with a more detailed description found here.

Data Collection and Granularity

EMS: EMSs collect highly granular data related to energy consumption. They monitor individual assets (such as HVAC systems, lighting, and machinery) and aggregate this information for analysis. This level of detail enables precise insights into energy usage patterns.

BMS: While BMSs collect energy data, they also track non-energy-related parameters. These include occupancy rates, maintenance schedules, and security alerts. However, BMSs may lack the granularity needed for in-depth energy analysis.

Energy Efficiency Focus

EMS: The primary goal of an EMS is energy efficiency. It helps facilities managers understand how energy is used across different areas of the building. By identifying energy-intensive zones or equipment, managers can implement targeted improvements.

BMS: BMSs serve a broader purpose, including comfort, safety, and maintenance. While they indirectly impact energy efficiency (through HVAC control, for instance), their primary focus extends beyond energy management.

Real-Time Monitoring and Alerts

EMS: Real-time monitoring is a core feature of EMSs. Facilities managers receive alerts when energy consumption exceeds predefined thresholds or when anomalies occur. This proactive approach allows for timely interventions.

BMS: BMSs provide alerts related to various building functions, but energy-specific alerts may be less frequent. They are better suited for long-term planning and historical analysis.

Energy Insights and Decision-Making

EMS: EMSs offer detailed insights into energy consumption patterns. Managers can analyse historical data, compare performance across time periods, and identify trends. This information informs decisions related to equipment upgrades, load shedding, and energy-saving initiatives.

BMS: BMSs provide a holistic view of building operations. While they contribute to decision-making, their energy insights are often less precise. Facilities managers may need to extract energy-specific data from the broader BMS context.

Integration with Other Systems

EMS and BMS: Organisations can integrate EMSs and BMSs for comprehensive facility management. For example, BMS data can inform maintenance schedules within an EMS. This synergy ensures that energy efficiency aligns with overall building performance.

Cost Considerations

EMSs: Investing in an EMS directly impacts energy costs. Energy expenses typically rank second only to labour costs in commercial facilities. In some industries, such as manufacturing, energy costs may even exceed labour costs. An EMS provides the fastest way to achieve savings by optimising energy consumption.

BMSs: While BMSs are valuable for overall building management, their impact on energy costs is indirect. They serve multiple purposes beyond energy efficiency, making them less focused on cost reduction.

Industry Trends and Adoption Rates

EMSs: Surprisingly, only 44% of companies have adopted EMSs, despite their potential benefits. Choosing an EMS allows organisations to prioritise energy efficiency and cost reduction.

BMSs: In contrast, approximately 70% of companies have implemented BMSs. However, BMSs are not always optimised for energy insights, and their adoption rates may not reflect their full potential.

The Future of Smart Energy Management

Energy management systems such as ours pave the way toward a sustainable and cost-effective future for our buildings and facilities. By focusing on precise energy insights, real-time monitoring, and targeted decision-making, EMSs empower facilities managers to create efficient, comfortable, and environmentally responsible spaces. As technology evolves, integrating EMSs with other smart building solutions will further enhance our ability to manage energy effectively and reduce our ecological footprint.